fbpx

Author: Neil Keefe

NHLPodcasts

Podcast: Brian Monzo

The state of New York sports isn’t exactly great. For my teams, the Yankees are coming off back-to-back postseason-less seasons for the first time since 1992-93, the Giants are 3-9 and are headed for a

New York Rangers vs. New York Islanders

The state of New York sports isn’t exactly great. For my teams, the Yankees are coming off back-to-back postseason-less seasons for the first time since 1992-93, the Giants are 3-9 and are headed for a third straight postseason-less season and the Knicks are the Knicks. The Rangers are the only good thing going right now when it comes to those four and on the other side of New York sports fandom, the Islanders are the only good thing going right now for the misfit fans.

WFAN Mike’s On: Francesa on the FAN producer Brian Monzo joined me to talk about Islanders fans needing to settle down following their team’s hot start, Rick Nash justifying our desire to trade for him at all costs, what exactly Team Degenerate is and if there’s a way Tom Coughlin can still keep his job.

Read More

PodcastsYankees

Podcast: John Jastremski

The Yankees last played a game on Sept. 28, but they have gotten worse. Well, maybe not worse, but they certainly haven’t gotten any better. If anything, the team that missed the playoffs in 2013

David Robertson

The Yankees last played a game on Sept. 28, but they have gotten worse. Well, maybe not worse, but they certainly haven’t gotten any better. If anything, the team that missed the playoffs in 2013 and again in 2014 is exactly the same team and with every team around them getting better (cough, cough, Red Sox, cough, cough). I don’t know what Brian Cashman is doing, but the rotation has concerns, the lineup has holes and there is still the issue of not having a shortstop. No big deal.

WFAN host John Jastremski joined me to talk about the Yankees’ lack of moves this offseason, what Brian Cashman’s strategy is for the future of the team and we touch on the state of his Dolphins and the Tom Coughlin situation.

Read More

BlogsColumns ArchiveGiants

The Tom Coughlin Conundrum

Once upon a time the Giants were 3-2, riding a three-game winning streak, making it seem like that 0-2 start against the Lions and Cardinals was an early-season hiccup and making believers out of everyone,

Tom Coughlin

Once upon a time the Giants were 3-2, riding a three-game winning streak, making it seem like that 0-2 start against the Lions and Cardinals was an early-season hiccup and making believers out of everyone, including me. Then again, it’s never been hard to make a believer out of me when it comes to the Giants.

Back-to-back losses to start the season? No problem, they’ll win the next three. Three straight wins over teams that are currently a combined 14-22? We’re the team to beat. Back-to-back losses to the Eagles and Cowboys before the bye week? We’ll use the bye to get healthy and bounce back. Run out of the building in Indianapolis? We just have to go 2-1 in the next three games. Meltdown in Seattle? We can beat the 49ers and Cowboys. Losses to the 49ers and Cowboys to fall to 3-8? We can win out and save Tom Coughlin’s job. Blowing a 21-point lead to the one-win Jaguars to lose a seventh straight game? (Crickets … crickets … crickets.)

That’s a lot of irrational thinking for someone who has spent his entire life watching this team pull the rug out from underneath me except for two unbelievable runs. And it’s because of those two runs that the world was kept safe from hearing about the 2007 Patriots every day forever and from keeping Brady and Belichick from immortality once again in 2011. If not for those two postseason runs, Brady and Belichick would likely be 5-0 in the Super Bowl and if the Packers had won the NFC Championship Game in 2007 or the 49ers had won it in 2011, they would be. And it’s because of those two runs that I believe in this team when I shouldn’t and it’s because of those two runs that even without the playoffs for a third straight year, I kept wanting Tom Coughlin to be the Giants’ head coach in 2015. But after Sunday, thinking that might be my most irrational thought of all.

Here’s how every Giants season has gone during the Tom Coughlin era:

2004: The Giants start the year 5-2 with Kurt Warner starting and showing Eli the ropes. They lose back-to-back games to fall to 5-4 and start planning for the future by letting Eli start, which causes unrest and division in the locker room. Eli goes 1-6 in his first seven starts in the league, but wins the final game of the year against the Cowboys. The Giants finish the year at 6-10 and don’t make the playoffs.

2005: It’s Eli’s first full year. The Giants go 6-2 in the first half of the season then go 5-3 in the second half of the season. They make the playoffs for the first time since blowing a 24-point lead against the 49ers in the 2002 playoffs. The Giants lose 23-0 at home in the first round of the playoffs, as Eli goes 10-for-18 for 113 yards with no touchdowns and three interceptions. The Giants finish with just 132 total yards in the game. Bad finish.

2006: The Giants start the year 6-2, but are now 7-7, and entering Week 16, for them to clinch a playoff berth, they need one of two scenarios to happen.

1. Win + Minnesota loss or tie + Atlanta loss + Philadelphia win or tie + Seattle win or tie.

OR

2. Win + Minnesota loss or tie + Atlanta loss + Philadelphia win or tie + San Francisco loss or tie.

The Giants lose 30-7 to the Saints, but the Vikings, Falcons, Seahawks and 49ers all lose too, and the Giants basically hit the biggest parlay ever. Only the Eagles win, so the Giants just need to win in Week 17 against the Redskins and they make the playoffs at 8-8.

The Giants beat the Redskins to get into the playoffs at 8-8 thanks to a Giants single-game rushing record of 234 yards (on just 23 carries) from Tiki Barber. The Giants are just the ninth team in history to reach the postseason without a winning record. After starting the year 6-2, they finish the year 2-6. Then they lose 23-20 to the Eagles in the first round of the playoffs on a David Akers 38-yard field goal with no time remaining.

2007: They start the year 0-2, but win six in a row after that. After their bye in Week 9, they finish the year 4-4, and with a 10-6 record, they are the No. 5 seed in the playoffs. They run the table on the road in the NFC playoffs, beating the Buccaneers, Cowboys and Packers and then beat the 18-0 Patriots in the Super Bowl.

2008: They’re 11-1, but are now without Plaxico Burress for the rest of the year. The Giants finish the regular season 1-3 (they would have finished 0-4 if John Kasay didn’t miss a field goal for the Panthers in Week 16), but still get the No. 1 seed in the NFC playoffs. They lose in the divisional round at home to the Eagles 23-11.

2009: They start the year 5-0, and then lose four games in a row. They come off their bye week to beat the Falcons in Week 11, but lose four of their last six games in embarrassing fashion to finish the year at 8-8, and miss the playoffs.

2010: They’re 6-2 after Week 9, but then they lose to Jon Kitna and the 2-6 Cowboys at home, and then they lose in Philadelphia the following week thanks to five turnovers and an Eli dive that turns into a fumble with the Giants down by seven and 2:51 left in the game. At 6-4, the Giants win three in a row, and have a chance to lock up the NFC East in Week 15 at home against the Eagles. They blow a 21-point lead with 7:18 left and lose. They have a chance to rebound the following week and still make the playoffs, but they lose 45-17 in Green Bay. In Week 17, they need a win against the Redskins and a Bears win over the Packers. They beat the Redskins 17-14 on the road, but the Bears lose to the Packers.

2011: The season was a Tony Romo to Miles Austin completion away from being maybe the worst collapse of them all. After losing to the 49ers, the Giants lost the next three games to start the second half of their season 0-4, dropping them to 6-6. We all know what happened in the final five minutes and 41 seconds in Dallas in Week 14 and after that, but no one knew all of that would happen. No one could fathom that all of that would happen and happen essentially the same way it did four years before.

2012: They start off 2-2, but win four straight to improve to 6-2. They lose four of their next six, but set themselves up where back-to-back wins in the final two weeks against the Ravens and Eagles will clinch them a playoff spot. They lose to the Ravens 33-14 (a week after losing 34-0 to the Falcons) and wind up beating the Eagles 42-7 in Week 17, but it doesn’t matter. A 9-7 season.

2013: They lose their first six games of the season before winning the next four. Somehow at 4-6 they control their own destiny if they can beat the Cowboys in Week 12. They have their chances to win the game, but tied at 21 with four seconds left, the Cowboys kick a 35-yard field goal to end the Giants’ season. After starting 0-4, they win seven of 10, but the 7-9 record is the worst since 2004.

And then there’s this season, which didn’t even have a second half to collapse.

Eli Manning was right when he said that Tom Coughlin didn’t fumble the ball like Eli did or the way Larry Donnell did. It wasn’t Tom Coughlin who couldn’t stop the Jaguars from getting down the field in the final minute to kick a go-ahead field goal. But it wasn’t just about the Jaguars game and it’s not about the Giants’ misfortune of having the most player on injured reserve in the entire NFL this season. It’s about a 3-2 start that’s become 3-9 this season. It’s about the 0-6 start last year and the 6-2 start that became a 9-7 finish in 2012. It’s about the second-half collapses that happened before the last two years when there wasn’t even a second half to collapse and it’s about Tom Coughlin being the oldest coach in the NFL and the idea that 11 years straight coaching any NFL team should be calculated in dog years and that 11 years straight coaching an NFL team in New York should be calculated goldfish years. Coughlin should be commended for his longevity in this city and should get to go out on his own terms, but that’s unlikely to happen now.

It’s not that all of the non-2007/2011 seasons are Tom Coughlin’s fault and it’s not like he is the sole reason for the team’s constant underachieving. The problem with the Giants isn’t even necessarily Tom Coughlin at all. The real problem is the situation the ownership has created.

Ownership gave their 11-year, two-time champion, 68-year-old head coach a first-year offensive coordinator he didn’t want and their general manager gave him an offensive line unfit for the NFL and a pass rush that’s mostly non-existent. They set themselves up for a scenario where their next head coach is either going to be someone with just one year of coordinator experience (Ben McAdoo) or one where a new head coach is going to have to agree to have McAdoo on his staff in order to be the Giants’ coach. Because after one year and with Eli Manning on his way to potentially posting career bests in completion percentage, touchdowns and interceptions, McAdoo isn’t going anywhere. So a new head coach (if it’s not McAdoo) is going to start in the same position Coughlin will have left in and after Sunday’s 2006-loss-to-Tennessee-esque performance, it’s likely that Coughlin is going to pay for the Giants’ fall from Super Bowl champions to 9-7 to 7-9 to whatever embarrassing record they finish with this season. And for the first time since the end of the 2010 season, I’m unsure of what I want when it comes to Coughlin as the head coach of the Giants.

The following is what I wrote at the end of the 2010 season.

This is what scares me about Tom Coughlin. I have wanted Tom Coughlin out several times, but who’s to say that Bill Cowher or anyone else they bring in will be better? Coughlin is the only coach that Eli Manning has every played under in the NFL, and I don’t know if right now is the right time to be changing the whole landscape of the coaching staff at this stage of Eli’s career.

There are many times when I wish I could confront Coughlin and just say, “Are you effing kidding me?” Like when he wasn’t ready for the Eagles’ onside kick or when he ripped into Matt Dodge in the middle of the field after DeSean Jackson’s punt return. Joe Girardi’s pitching changes usually get the most four-letter words out of my mouth, but Tom Coughlin’s decision making this season has taken the belt away from Girardi.

If Coughlin is fired, then so be it.

And if Coughlin isn’t fired, I’m OK with that too.

This time around it’s the same thing.

Read More

MLBPodcasts

Podcast: Mike Hurley

The football season is over in New York and for the Giants and the way things are going for the Yankees this offseason, the baseball season might for me might go the same way this

Pablo Sandoval

The football season is over in New York and for the Giants and the way things are going for the Yankees this offseason, the baseball season might for me might go the same way this football season did. Up in Boston, the Patriots are chugging along and look like they are headed back to at least the AFC Championship Game, while the Red Sox are adding every reliable bat on the open market. Things aren’t going well right now.

Mike Hurley of CBS Boston joined me talk about whether it’s better to have been a Giants fan or a Patriots fan over the last 10 years, which team can continue the Patriots’ championship drought and the Red Sox using the 2004-08 Yankees’ strategy when it comes to building their team.

Read More

BlogsRangers

Martin St. Louis’ Huge Mistake

Stay afloat. That’s what the Rangers’ game plan has been through the first 18 games of the season thanks to injuries and that’s what they had somewhat done up until 10 days ago. But in

Martin St. Louis

Stay afloat. That’s what the Rangers’ game plan has been through the first 18 games of the season thanks to injuries and that’s what they had somewhat done up until 10 days ago. But in their last six games over those 10 days, the Rangers have gone 1-3-2, earning just four of a possible 12 points and falling back to .500 at 7-7-4. Outside of opening night, when they beat the Western Conference-leading Blues on the road, the Rangers haven’t had their expected top-six defensemen in the lineup in the same game. And until Ryan McDonagh gets back, they won’t. And until then, they are going to have to do a better job preventing five-goal games from happening.

Monday night against the Lightning was the fifth time this season the Rangers allowed at least five goals in a game (they only allowed five goals or more eight times last season) and it was the wrong time to fill Madison Square Garden with defensive brain farts and turnovers. It was the homecoming for Ryan Callahan (and to a lesser extent, Brian Boyle and Anton Stralman) and the first time the former captain who ran himself out of town with his absurd contract expectations and inability to compromise led to the trade for Martin St. Louis. And with that trade came the Rangers’ first Stanley Cup Final appearance in 20 years. But for some people, like The Hockey News’ Adam Proteau, the Lightning won a trade that is barely eight months old because right now the Lightning have a better record than the Rangers and that’s all that matters in the sports world where every day we have to figure out who is the best player or who is the next champion or who is a Hall of Famer without letting things play out. I thought the hockey world was different from the other sports when it came to nonsensical debates and premature career projections, and maybe it is, but not when it comes to Proteau.

Proteau (the man who once tweeted that Matt Cooke has been victimized by hitting Marc Savard in the head and ending Savard’s career and altering his life) wrote a “column” (I use this word loosely) titled “When he left the Lightning for the Rangers, Martin St. Louis made a huge mistake” in which the headline was nearly longer than the actual 545-word column, so let’s look at Proteau’s column (in italics).

After watching Martin St-Louis play his former teammates in Tampa Bay for the first time since the March trade that sent him to the New York Rangers for Ryan Callahan, and two draft picks, I’m pretty confident in saying this:

St-Louis made a huge mistake.

After reading the first 46 words, I’m pretty confident in saying this:

Adam Proteau made a huge mistake.

If the Rangers don’t blow two-goal leads in Games 1 and 2 of the Stanley Cup Final or blow a third-period lead in Game 5 or if they had won any of the three overtime games in the series or if Chris Kreider could score on a breakaway or if Dan Girardi wasn’t Dan Girardi then these words would have never been written by Proteau. (Actually, they probably still would have been.) But the Rangers lost the Stanley Cup Final, so in return we not only got a Rangers’ Stanley Cup loss, but these 545 words from Proteau.

Yes, it’s only one game, but the Lightning’s thorough 5-1 pounding of the Blueshirts Monday was a demonstration of (a) all the things that make Tampa such a favorite of pundits this off-season, and (b) many of the things that make some of us question the Rangers as a serious Stanley Cup contender.

After watching one game (a pretty large sample size), I’m going to make a serious proclamation and then I’m going to say it’s still only one game after I make that proclamation. That’s quite the strategy for someone to try to prove their point.

St-Louis did score the home side’s only goal at Madison Square Garden, but, in a sign from the hockey gods as to which side is likely to emerge over time as the ultimate winner of the trade, Callahan scored two goals for the Bolts.

St. Louis did score the Rangers’ only goal on Monday, so that’s good because if someone else had scored the Rangers’ only goal then this “huge mistake” that St. Louis made would have been that much bigger. But he scored and not another Ranger, so it’s only a “huge mistake” for now.

I wish I had known that the hockey gods would be giving us some foreshadowing at the Garden on Monday night because I could have accomplished a lot of other things between 7 and 10 p.m. instead of watching a poor defensive effort from a makeshift Rangers defense, highlighted by Dan Girardi taking a nice Sunday Skate in the neutral zone on what became a breakaway and then sliding and rolling around on the ice rather than clearing the front of the net on Ryan Callahan’s first goal. But that goal wasn’t Girardi’s fault or him proving that his six-year, $33 million extension wasn’t the best idea. That goal was the result of the hockey gods foreshadowing the eventual outcome of the St. Louis trade.

More importantly, the Lightning also got another banner night from Steven Stamkos, who scored once and added two assists while being the most dangerous player on the ice. Why St-Louis would want to leave a team with a young superstar for one that didn’t have anyone comparable is head-scratching, to say the least.

Does Proteau really think St. Louis cares about Steven Stamkos, playing with Stamkos, not playing with Stamkos or playing for a team without Stamkos?

St. Louis is from Quebec. He went to school at Vermont. His wife is from Greenwich, Conn. where the family lives in the offseason and St. Louis runs a summer hockey camp at the Twin Rinks in Stamford, Conn. Madison Square Garden is about 31.7 miles from Greenwich and 45 minutes on Metro North.

Not only did St. Louis likely want to live in one location to be with his entire family year-round, but I’m sure his wife also had some impact on his decision making because it is his wife and I’m going to assume that she has some say in the decisions St. Louis makes. Is Friday Night Lights not available in Canada? Eric and Tammy Taylor could teach you a few valuable life lessons.

But it’s more than just the presence of Stamkos that makes St-Louis’ decision to leave Tampa Bay a regrettable one.

Again, I’m sure 39-year-old St. Louis, who has a wife and kids and whose home is about 31.7 miles from the Garden, really took into account the idea of playing hockey with a 24-year-old when weighing his family’s own future.

The Rangers have had some serious injuries to deal with this season (including key cogs Derek Stepan and Ryan McDonagh), but even with those players in the lineup, the Lightning are deeper at forward and on defense and have more blossoming young talent (including Jonathan Drouin, Victor Hedman, Tyler Johnson and Nikita Kucherov, among others) than the Blueshirts.

Effing St. Louis! How could he have not known the Rangers would be dealing with injuries to Derek Stepan, Dan Boyle and Ryan McDonagh to start the season? How could he not have realized that the Rangers’ best two defensemen and their first-line center would miss significant time to begin the season?

And with goalie Ben Bishop proving his superb 2013-14 campaign was no fluke, you can’t even argue the Rangers have a significant advantage in net anymore – at least, not when star Henrik Lundqvist is struggling to find his consistency so far this year.

I originally thought Proteau using one game as a reason to decide who won the St. Louis was as bad it was going to get? But then he went and wrote that St. Louis should have put the notion of playing hockey with a 24-year-old over what’s best for his own family and I thought that was as bad as it would get, but then that goalie comparison happened.

After Monday’s loss, Henrik Lundqvist is 7-5-3 with a 2.68 goals-against average and .910 save percentage. No, those aren’t Lundqvist-like numbers, but when you have Matt Hunwick playing in all but two games so far and Michael Kostka, Dylan McIlrath and Connor Allen dressing and playing because of injuries and John Moore deciding to Scott Stevens people then you’re not going to have Vezina-like numbers. But if we’re going to sit here and say Ben Bishop is better than Henrik Lundqvist because of six weeks of a season then I guess Jakub Voracek is a better scorer than Sidney Crosby, Patric Hornqvist is a better pure goal scorer than Alexander Ovechkin and Nick Foligno is a 1.13 points-per-game player.

At the time of the trade, many speculated St-Louis’ relationship with Bolts GM Steve Yzerman over not initially being named to Canada’s 2014 Olympic roster had deteriorated to the point he demanded to be moved, and perhaps that’s true. As one of the greatest players in modern memory, he had accumulated enough power to ask out if he truly believed he didn’t fit with the organization any longer. However, the circumstances surrounding St-Louis’ departure have never been made fully clear. Until they are, all we can judge St-Louis on are the facts apparent to us.

The “circumstances surrounding St. Louis’ departure have never been made fully clear” but I’m going to write a 545-word column about why he shouldn’t have asked for a trade! The only thing we’re missing from Proteau is the use of “having said that” in this masterpiece.

And right now, the fact is St-Louis left a team that looks to be a force with which to reckon for many years to come for a team whose leading scorer, Rick Nash, will be 31 years old next summer and whose backbone between the pipes will be 33 in March.

The Lightning finished 46-27-9 last year and were swept in the first round by the Canadiens, who the Rangers eliminated two rounds later. This year they are 13-4-2 and are currently second in the Atlantic and there’s a good chance they will face the Bruins or Canadiens or both in the first round this year. Then I guess we’ll find out about the reckoning. (The Lightning also have to play 63 games before they get to that point before they can show off their “force”.)

At 39 years old, he wants to win now, but does anyone see the Rangers as a serious threat to win the Eastern Conference again this year? At this stage, there’s no guarantee they’ll even be in the post-season.

I think Proteau needs to get the idea that St. Louis “wants to win now” out of his head. I’m sure he would like to win and is doing everything he can to win, but if he retires without winning again, he will retire with his name on the Cup, over 1,000 career points (he’s at 995 now) and at least one Hart, one Lester B. Pearson, two Art Rosses, three Lady Byngs and six All-Star appearances.

There’s no guarantee the Rangers will be in the postseason this year. There’s also no guarantee the Lightning will either. Or the Canadiens. Or the Blackhawks. Or the Kings. Or the Blues. Or any team.

St-Louis has had a Hall-of-Fame worthy career, but even Hall-of-Famers make mistakes. And thus far, his choice to leave Stamkos & Co. behind looks to be the worst move he could’ve made.

Martin St. Louis helped lead the Rangers to the Stanley Cup Final in June and gave Rangers fans their best season in two decades. He lives in Greenwich, Conn. with his wife and kids. He is making $5 million this year to play hockey for a living and gets to do his job at Madison Square Garden. If demanding a trade to get all of these things is the worst decision he could have made then I need to start making bad decisions.

Read More