fbpx

Blogs

BlogsYankees

The First Shortstop Since Fourth Grade

The last time the Yankees needed a shortstop I was in fourth grade. Now for the first time since I was nine years old, the Yankees’ shortstop is someone with a number other than 2,

Did Gregorius

The last time the Yankees needed a shortstop I was in fourth grade. Now for the first time since I was nine years old, the Yankees’ shortstop is someone with a number other than 2, someone not named Derek Jeter.

Part of me is still holding out hope that everything that has happened since February when Jeter announced his retirement has been one big, well-planned and sick joke. I sometimes wish I have been living in my own version of The Truman Show and that everyone in the world has been in on it by trying to make me think Derek Jeter will never play baseball again. It’s the reason why I still haven’t written my “Goodbye” column for him and have put it off for as long as possible and will likely put it off until at least spring training and maybe even Opening Day.

But if everything about Jeter over the last 10 months has been a worldwide plan to trick me into thinking the last link to my childhood baseball fandom is gone then I guess Brian Cashman and the Yankees front office is heavily invested in the joke since they traded a 26-year-old promising starting pitcher in Shane Greene for a 24-year-old shortstop in Didi Gregorius. I’m beginning to think Derek Jeter really isn’t coming back.

In this city, there a few people and a few jobs that are impossible to replace and Derek Jeter is No. 1 (and in the sports world is No. 1 across the board in the country). Anyone who was going to replace Chris “Mad Dog” Russo alongside Mike Francesa was never going to be “Mad Dog” and that show and time slot was never going to be the same and fortunately there hasn’t been anyone to try to fill those shoes. The person who is going to one day replace Mike Francesa every weekday from 1-6:30 on WFAN shouldn’t expect rave reviews since that transition will likely have Bob Raissman and Phil Mushnick longing for the days of the Pope. Joe Girardi had to replace Joe Torre, who spent all 12 of his seasons with the Yankees in the playoffs and six of those 12 in the World Series, and unless Girardi topped four World Series in his first five years, he was never going to be Torre. David Robertson had to replace not only the Yankees’ 17-year closer, but the greatest closer in the history of baseball. Despite a revolving door of sandwich makers, the cafeteria in the Time Life Building in Rockefeller Center is probably still looking for a sandwich-making replacement for Norma. And now Didi Gregorius is taking over (not replacing) for Derek Jeter.

Aside from actually becoming the First Shortstop Since Fourth Grade, former Arizona Diamondbacks general manager Kevin Towers didn’t exactly do Gregorius any favors when he traded for him and gave his evaluation of the shortstop.

“When I saw him he reminded me of a young Derek Jeter. I was fortunate enough to see Jeter when he was in high school in Michigan and he’s got that type of range. He’s got speed. He’s more of a line drive-type hitter, but I think he’s got the type of approach at the plate where I think there’s going to be power there as well.”

So for any irrational Yankees fan out there, that December 2012 quote couldn’t have been more perfect for setting Gregorius’ expectations as high as possible by implanting the idea that Gregorius looks and plays and could be Derek Jeter. Sure, Towers didn’t know at the time that his newly acquired young player would be the Yankees’ shortstop of the future in two years, but in retrospect he couldn’t have given a worse possible quote to stifle expectations for a kid being asked to do an impossible job unless he said, “Didi Gregorius is related to Derek Jeter.”

The person who took over for Derek Jeter was never going to have a fairytale transition into their new job unless their April 2015 replicated Shane Spencer’s September 1998. But when it comes to Didi, he might be best set up to be the new Yankees’ shortstop because he isn’t a big name free agent or a proven star, who the Yankees had to either back up the money truck for or trade the farm to acquire. If the Yankees had signed Hanley Ramirez or traded for Troy Tulowitzki, the First Shortstop Since First Grade would have A-Rod-like pressure from their first at-bat with the Yankees. Ramirez would have cost the Yankees another multiyear deal for eight figures for a player in his 30s with past injury and personality problems. Troy Tulowitzki would have cost the Yankees an even longer contract for an even more injury-prone player and some of the organization’s best prospects on top of that. If Didi doesn’t live up to Kevin Towers’ initial comparison and isn’t the long-term answer for the Yankees then all it cost was a 26-year-old right-handed starter, who is anything but proven. And if it does work out, the Yankees just got the foundation up the middle for the future for an unproven 26-year-old right-hander.

I have seen Gregorius play minimally during his 191 career games in the majors, but if his glove is as good as touted and his offense can mirror his 2013 season (.252/.332/.373) or if his offense starts to show signs of what he did in 260 Triple-A plate appearances last season (.310/.389/.447) then I have no problem with Didi being the future. Even without knowing what he is yet or what he will become, he’s a better option than watching Stephen Drew or Brendan Ryan become the First Shortstop Since Fourth Grade since we already know what they are.

As recent as Friday morning I was scared about where this Yankees offseason was headed and what my 2015 summer was going to look like with holes still up the middle and question marks in the rotation and in the bullpen. But I feel a little more comfortable in knowing that there is a real, true, viable player who could be the Yankees’ answer at shortstop.

Didi Gregorius doesn’t have to be Derek Jeter and if he wanted to, he can’t be. No one can. For now, he’s just the First Shortstop Since Fourth Grade and with four months until Opening Day, he can’t be anything more.

Read More

BlogsGiants

NFL Week 14 Picks

It’s the home stretch. The final month and four weeks of the regular season to take us through the holidays and into the playoffs where the Giants won’t be the for the third straight year.

Eli Manning

It’s the home stretch. The final month and four weeks of the regular season to take us through the holidays and into the playoffs where the Giants won’t be the for the third straight year.

It was weird in the 2011 playoffs against the Falcons when the Giants were playing their first playoff game since losing to the Eagles in the 2008 playoffs to think about how much time had passed between postseason appearances for them (obviously not a lot compared to other teams, but a lot for the Giants) and if the Giants are to rebound next season and reach the playoffs again, it will be a year longer drought from Super Bowl XLVI to then than it was from 2008-11.

The Giants have gone 18-26 since winning the Super Bowl and now we are likely looking at the last month of Tom Coughlin’s 11-year tenure with the team. When the Giants were defending champions and 6-2 and back in 2012, I didn’t think two years later I would be wondering when the next time they would make the playoffs would be, but here we are looking at another postseason-less Giants season. And to make matters worse, the Patriots appear headed back to the Super Bowl and if the Giants aren’t there to stop them, who will?

(Home team in caps)

Dallas -4 over CHICAGO
When the Bears were leading the Lions 14-3 on Thanksgiving, I was not only wondering why I didn’t bet the Bears to cover, but why I didn’t hammer the Bears’ money line as well. But then that 14-3 led to a 24-3 deficit and at the end of it all, the Bears lost 34-17, were outscored 31-3 after that early lead and finished with 13 rushing yards and two more Jay Cutler interceptions. Every week that I take the Bears makes me feel like Drew Barrymore in 50 First Dates and Sunday represents Adam Sandler making me remember why I swore to no longer pick the Bears back in Week 6.

Baltimore +3 over MIAMI
I wouldn’t mind jumping on the Dolphins’ bandwagon if they were to make the playoffs as currently one of five 7-5 teams in the AFC. The problem is that jumping on their bandwagon would likely be a short ride to elimination. I don’t like the Dolphins aside from the fact that they match up well with the Patriots (which John Jastremski eluded to on the podcast this week) and that is enough for me to pull for the Dolphins since it could mean ending the Patriots’ season. But aside from that, the Dolphins aren’t a team anyone should feel confident backing, considering their narrow escape against the Jets, their meltdown against the Packers and their early-season debacles against the Bills and Chiefs. I need to see a little more than a three-point victory against a Geno Smith-led Jets team playing for nothing in Week 13 to have me put my faith in a team this January (if they make it).

CINCINNATI -3 over Pittsburgh
Two of my least favorite teams meeting this week and for some reason I’m doing the dumbest thing anyone picking NFL games by the spread can do aside from picking Jay Cutler giving points: picking Andy Dalton giving points. I’m wondering at what point of the game I will regret this pick and the over/under is currently set at the first TV timeout. But to be fair, the Bengals have won three straight, are home where they have lost once in the last two years and did go into the Superdome three weeks ago and beat the Saints, which is something as rare as getting a seat on a Metro North train that doesn’t have some unusual stain or residue on it.

Indianapolis -4 over CLEVELAND
I would like to know what this line would be if Johnny Manziel were starting. And whatever that line is, I would be taking the Browns to cover it. I’m not sure how Mike Pettine has watched Brian Hoyer recently and watched Johnny Manziel was able to do in limited time and thinks that Hoyer gives his team the best chance to win. Yes, the Browns are 7-5 this season with Hoyer throwing 11 touchdowns and 10 interceptions and everyone is acting as if what he is doing is improbable when they should be surprised the Browns have a 7-5 record despite his inconsistent play and should be wondering how many more wins the team could have if Manziel had been the starter. But I’m sure Pettine will bench Hoyer for Manziel at some point on Sunday with the Colts holding a commanding lead and the Browns will fall to 7-6 and waste a chance at giving themselves the best chance to win a home game in December with a playoff spot on the line.

Jacksonville +6.5 over HOUSTON
Somewhere someone who isn’t a Jaguars fan or a Texans fan is going to bet on this game and watch it in its entirety. Think about that.

New York Giants -1.5 over TENNESSEE
I have never used this on the Giants before, but after what happened in Jacksonville, I’m not sure how a TV network can justify shelling out an exorbitant amount of money to broadcast this game when they could just donate that money to charity or pay for some kids to go to college. Here it goes:

Somewhere someone who isn’t a Giants fan or a Titans fan is going to bet on this game and watch it in its entirety. Think about that.

NEW ORLEANS -10 over Carolina
I thought I knew who the Saints were. I thought they were indestructible in the Superdome and just had to worry about finding a way to win two or three road games each year to make the playoffs. But then they went and lost three straight home games for the first time since 2005 before bouncing back on the road in Pittsburgh. If the Saints can’t win at the Superdome, but can suddenly win on the road and in a place like Heinz Field then how is anyone picking games or wagering on games anymore? The Saints are definitely going to win the NFC South with a losing record and then win their first-round playoff game to make up for what happened to them in the 2010 playoffs in Seattle after a week of every talking head show debating about how unfair it is that an under-.500 team received a playoff berth.

DETROIT -10 over Tampa Bay
I was ready to write how Ford Field is becoming what the Superdome once was and then I remembered that the Bills went there and won back in Week 5. But even if Detroit’s home-field advantage isn’t what New Orleans’ has been during the Sean Payton era, this year it’s strong enough that this game will be teased down by every person making a teaser this week.

St. Louis -3 over WASHINGTON
“RGIII and Out” might be the best nickname I have ever heard in my life and I can’t wait to bring it up when I talk to my friend and Redskins fan Ray Schneider next week on the site before the Giants and Redskins meet for what should be promoted as the “Battle for the Basement” in the NFC East. With reports surfacing that Jay Gruden is done with RGIII and wants him off his team just two years removed from winning the division, the Redskins are following the Jets’ path to success: one step forward, 93 steps backward.

MINNESOTA -6 over New York Jets
I can’t stop thinking about what the Vikings’ season could have been if Teddy Bridgewater had been the starting quarterback from Week 1, Adrian Peterson didn’t behave the way he did and if Norv Turner ever realized that Cordarrelle Patterson is on his team. At the worst, their 5-7 season could easily have been flipped and at 7-5 right now, they would be in the mix for a playoff spot. But they’re not.

DENVER -10 over Buffalo
I don’t really trust the Broncos anymore and I don’t know if they will be able to overtake the No. 1 overall seed in the AFC from the Patriots over the next four weeks, and if they’re not, we might as well cancel the AFC playoffs and pencil in the Patriots for the Super Bowl. It’s time the Broncos played like the Broncos.

ARIZONA +1 over Kansas City
Bruce Arians probably regrets saying that the Cardinals can still win the Super Bowl with Drew Stanton as his quarterback, but really believing Stanton was that good wasn’t his biggest problem. His biggest problem was saying “can still win” as if the Cardinals could have won with Carson Palmer as their quarterback. The Cardinals’ three-game lead has slipped to a one-game lead in the division and after they missed out on the playoffs at 10-6 last year while the 8-7-1 Packers were in, the Cardinals deserve to have a  little redemption this season.

San Francisco -9 over OAKLAND
I would take San Francisco -24 here and if they didn’t cover I wouldn’t even care. I don’t know how anyone could feel confident taking the Raiders to cover or even score after what happened last week.

Seattle +1 over PHILADELPHIA
Right now, the Patriots have the 1-seed in the AFC, which means they are pretty much going to the Super Bowl. The only two NFC teams I think that can beat them in Arizona in February are the Seahawks and Packers, so I will be rooting for both teams (two teams I don’t like) the rest of the season until one emerges from the NFC.

SAN DIEGO +4 over New England
This pick is about one thing and one thing only: getting the Broncos the 1-seed.

GREEN BAY -13 over Atlanta
The Packers are the best home team in the league right now and against a 5-7 Falcons team that is currently leading the NFC South, 13 points feels too low.

Last week: 9-7-0
Season: 95-96-1

Read More

BlogsColumns ArchiveGiants

The Tom Coughlin Conundrum

Once upon a time the Giants were 3-2, riding a three-game winning streak, making it seem like that 0-2 start against the Lions and Cardinals was an early-season hiccup and making believers out of everyone,

Tom Coughlin

Once upon a time the Giants were 3-2, riding a three-game winning streak, making it seem like that 0-2 start against the Lions and Cardinals was an early-season hiccup and making believers out of everyone, including me. Then again, it’s never been hard to make a believer out of me when it comes to the Giants.

Back-to-back losses to start the season? No problem, they’ll win the next three. Three straight wins over teams that are currently a combined 14-22? We’re the team to beat. Back-to-back losses to the Eagles and Cowboys before the bye week? We’ll use the bye to get healthy and bounce back. Run out of the building in Indianapolis? We just have to go 2-1 in the next three games. Meltdown in Seattle? We can beat the 49ers and Cowboys. Losses to the 49ers and Cowboys to fall to 3-8? We can win out and save Tom Coughlin’s job. Blowing a 21-point lead to the one-win Jaguars to lose a seventh straight game? (Crickets … crickets … crickets.)

That’s a lot of irrational thinking for someone who has spent his entire life watching this team pull the rug out from underneath me except for two unbelievable runs. And it’s because of those two runs that the world was kept safe from hearing about the 2007 Patriots every day forever and from keeping Brady and Belichick from immortality once again in 2011. If not for those two postseason runs, Brady and Belichick would likely be 5-0 in the Super Bowl and if the Packers had won the NFC Championship Game in 2007 or the 49ers had won it in 2011, they would be. And it’s because of those two runs that I believe in this team when I shouldn’t and it’s because of those two runs that even without the playoffs for a third straight year, I kept wanting Tom Coughlin to be the Giants’ head coach in 2015. But after Sunday, thinking that might be my most irrational thought of all.

Here’s how every Giants season has gone during the Tom Coughlin era:

2004: The Giants start the year 5-2 with Kurt Warner starting and showing Eli the ropes. They lose back-to-back games to fall to 5-4 and start planning for the future by letting Eli start, which causes unrest and division in the locker room. Eli goes 1-6 in his first seven starts in the league, but wins the final game of the year against the Cowboys. The Giants finish the year at 6-10 and don’t make the playoffs.

2005: It’s Eli’s first full year. The Giants go 6-2 in the first half of the season then go 5-3 in the second half of the season. They make the playoffs for the first time since blowing a 24-point lead against the 49ers in the 2002 playoffs. The Giants lose 23-0 at home in the first round of the playoffs, as Eli goes 10-for-18 for 113 yards with no touchdowns and three interceptions. The Giants finish with just 132 total yards in the game. Bad finish.

2006: The Giants start the year 6-2, but are now 7-7, and entering Week 16, for them to clinch a playoff berth, they need one of two scenarios to happen.

1. Win + Minnesota loss or tie + Atlanta loss + Philadelphia win or tie + Seattle win or tie.

OR

2. Win + Minnesota loss or tie + Atlanta loss + Philadelphia win or tie + San Francisco loss or tie.

The Giants lose 30-7 to the Saints, but the Vikings, Falcons, Seahawks and 49ers all lose too, and the Giants basically hit the biggest parlay ever. Only the Eagles win, so the Giants just need to win in Week 17 against the Redskins and they make the playoffs at 8-8.

The Giants beat the Redskins to get into the playoffs at 8-8 thanks to a Giants single-game rushing record of 234 yards (on just 23 carries) from Tiki Barber. The Giants are just the ninth team in history to reach the postseason without a winning record. After starting the year 6-2, they finish the year 2-6. Then they lose 23-20 to the Eagles in the first round of the playoffs on a David Akers 38-yard field goal with no time remaining.

2007: They start the year 0-2, but win six in a row after that. After their bye in Week 9, they finish the year 4-4, and with a 10-6 record, they are the No. 5 seed in the playoffs. They run the table on the road in the NFC playoffs, beating the Buccaneers, Cowboys and Packers and then beat the 18-0 Patriots in the Super Bowl.

2008: They’re 11-1, but are now without Plaxico Burress for the rest of the year. The Giants finish the regular season 1-3 (they would have finished 0-4 if John Kasay didn’t miss a field goal for the Panthers in Week 16), but still get the No. 1 seed in the NFC playoffs. They lose in the divisional round at home to the Eagles 23-11.

2009: They start the year 5-0, and then lose four games in a row. They come off their bye week to beat the Falcons in Week 11, but lose four of their last six games in embarrassing fashion to finish the year at 8-8, and miss the playoffs.

2010: They’re 6-2 after Week 9, but then they lose to Jon Kitna and the 2-6 Cowboys at home, and then they lose in Philadelphia the following week thanks to five turnovers and an Eli dive that turns into a fumble with the Giants down by seven and 2:51 left in the game. At 6-4, the Giants win three in a row, and have a chance to lock up the NFC East in Week 15 at home against the Eagles. They blow a 21-point lead with 7:18 left and lose. They have a chance to rebound the following week and still make the playoffs, but they lose 45-17 in Green Bay. In Week 17, they need a win against the Redskins and a Bears win over the Packers. They beat the Redskins 17-14 on the road, but the Bears lose to the Packers.

2011: The season was a Tony Romo to Miles Austin completion away from being maybe the worst collapse of them all. After losing to the 49ers, the Giants lost the next three games to start the second half of their season 0-4, dropping them to 6-6. We all know what happened in the final five minutes and 41 seconds in Dallas in Week 14 and after that, but no one knew all of that would happen. No one could fathom that all of that would happen and happen essentially the same way it did four years before.

2012: They start off 2-2, but win four straight to improve to 6-2. They lose four of their next six, but set themselves up where back-to-back wins in the final two weeks against the Ravens and Eagles will clinch them a playoff spot. They lose to the Ravens 33-14 (a week after losing 34-0 to the Falcons) and wind up beating the Eagles 42-7 in Week 17, but it doesn’t matter. A 9-7 season.

2013: They lose their first six games of the season before winning the next four. Somehow at 4-6 they control their own destiny if they can beat the Cowboys in Week 12. They have their chances to win the game, but tied at 21 with four seconds left, the Cowboys kick a 35-yard field goal to end the Giants’ season. After starting 0-4, they win seven of 10, but the 7-9 record is the worst since 2004.

And then there’s this season, which didn’t even have a second half to collapse.

Eli Manning was right when he said that Tom Coughlin didn’t fumble the ball like Eli did or the way Larry Donnell did. It wasn’t Tom Coughlin who couldn’t stop the Jaguars from getting down the field in the final minute to kick a go-ahead field goal. But it wasn’t just about the Jaguars game and it’s not about the Giants’ misfortune of having the most player on injured reserve in the entire NFL this season. It’s about a 3-2 start that’s become 3-9 this season. It’s about the 0-6 start last year and the 6-2 start that became a 9-7 finish in 2012. It’s about the second-half collapses that happened before the last two years when there wasn’t even a second half to collapse and it’s about Tom Coughlin being the oldest coach in the NFL and the idea that 11 years straight coaching any NFL team should be calculated in dog years and that 11 years straight coaching an NFL team in New York should be calculated goldfish years. Coughlin should be commended for his longevity in this city and should get to go out on his own terms, but that’s unlikely to happen now.

It’s not that all of the non-2007/2011 seasons are Tom Coughlin’s fault and it’s not like he is the sole reason for the team’s constant underachieving. The problem with the Giants isn’t even necessarily Tom Coughlin at all. The real problem is the situation the ownership has created.

Ownership gave their 11-year, two-time champion, 68-year-old head coach a first-year offensive coordinator he didn’t want and their general manager gave him an offensive line unfit for the NFL and a pass rush that’s mostly non-existent. They set themselves up for a scenario where their next head coach is either going to be someone with just one year of coordinator experience (Ben McAdoo) or one where a new head coach is going to have to agree to have McAdoo on his staff in order to be the Giants’ coach. Because after one year and with Eli Manning on his way to potentially posting career bests in completion percentage, touchdowns and interceptions, McAdoo isn’t going anywhere. So a new head coach (if it’s not McAdoo) is going to start in the same position Coughlin will have left in and after Sunday’s 2006-loss-to-Tennessee-esque performance, it’s likely that Coughlin is going to pay for the Giants’ fall from Super Bowl champions to 9-7 to 7-9 to whatever embarrassing record they finish with this season. And for the first time since the end of the 2010 season, I’m unsure of what I want when it comes to Coughlin as the head coach of the Giants.

The following is what I wrote at the end of the 2010 season.

This is what scares me about Tom Coughlin. I have wanted Tom Coughlin out several times, but who’s to say that Bill Cowher or anyone else they bring in will be better? Coughlin is the only coach that Eli Manning has every played under in the NFL, and I don’t know if right now is the right time to be changing the whole landscape of the coaching staff at this stage of Eli’s career.

There are many times when I wish I could confront Coughlin and just say, “Are you effing kidding me?” Like when he wasn’t ready for the Eagles’ onside kick or when he ripped into Matt Dodge in the middle of the field after DeSean Jackson’s punt return. Joe Girardi’s pitching changes usually get the most four-letter words out of my mouth, but Tom Coughlin’s decision making this season has taken the belt away from Girardi.

If Coughlin is fired, then so be it.

And if Coughlin isn’t fired, I’m OK with that too.

This time around it’s the same thing.

Read More

BlogsRangers

Martin St. Louis’ Huge Mistake

Stay afloat. That’s what the Rangers’ game plan has been through the first 18 games of the season thanks to injuries and that’s what they had somewhat done up until 10 days ago. But in

Martin St. Louis

Stay afloat. That’s what the Rangers’ game plan has been through the first 18 games of the season thanks to injuries and that’s what they had somewhat done up until 10 days ago. But in their last six games over those 10 days, the Rangers have gone 1-3-2, earning just four of a possible 12 points and falling back to .500 at 7-7-4. Outside of opening night, when they beat the Western Conference-leading Blues on the road, the Rangers haven’t had their expected top-six defensemen in the lineup in the same game. And until Ryan McDonagh gets back, they won’t. And until then, they are going to have to do a better job preventing five-goal games from happening.

Monday night against the Lightning was the fifth time this season the Rangers allowed at least five goals in a game (they only allowed five goals or more eight times last season) and it was the wrong time to fill Madison Square Garden with defensive brain farts and turnovers. It was the homecoming for Ryan Callahan (and to a lesser extent, Brian Boyle and Anton Stralman) and the first time the former captain who ran himself out of town with his absurd contract expectations and inability to compromise led to the trade for Martin St. Louis. And with that trade came the Rangers’ first Stanley Cup Final appearance in 20 years. But for some people, like The Hockey News’ Adam Proteau, the Lightning won a trade that is barely eight months old because right now the Lightning have a better record than the Rangers and that’s all that matters in the sports world where every day we have to figure out who is the best player or who is the next champion or who is a Hall of Famer without letting things play out. I thought the hockey world was different from the other sports when it came to nonsensical debates and premature career projections, and maybe it is, but not when it comes to Proteau.

Proteau (the man who once tweeted that Matt Cooke has been victimized by hitting Marc Savard in the head and ending Savard’s career and altering his life) wrote a “column” (I use this word loosely) titled “When he left the Lightning for the Rangers, Martin St. Louis made a huge mistake” in which the headline was nearly longer than the actual 545-word column, so let’s look at Proteau’s column (in italics).

After watching Martin St-Louis play his former teammates in Tampa Bay for the first time since the March trade that sent him to the New York Rangers for Ryan Callahan, and two draft picks, I’m pretty confident in saying this:

St-Louis made a huge mistake.

After reading the first 46 words, I’m pretty confident in saying this:

Adam Proteau made a huge mistake.

If the Rangers don’t blow two-goal leads in Games 1 and 2 of the Stanley Cup Final or blow a third-period lead in Game 5 or if they had won any of the three overtime games in the series or if Chris Kreider could score on a breakaway or if Dan Girardi wasn’t Dan Girardi then these words would have never been written by Proteau. (Actually, they probably still would have been.) But the Rangers lost the Stanley Cup Final, so in return we not only got a Rangers’ Stanley Cup loss, but these 545 words from Proteau.

Yes, it’s only one game, but the Lightning’s thorough 5-1 pounding of the Blueshirts Monday was a demonstration of (a) all the things that make Tampa such a favorite of pundits this off-season, and (b) many of the things that make some of us question the Rangers as a serious Stanley Cup contender.

After watching one game (a pretty large sample size), I’m going to make a serious proclamation and then I’m going to say it’s still only one game after I make that proclamation. That’s quite the strategy for someone to try to prove their point.

St-Louis did score the home side’s only goal at Madison Square Garden, but, in a sign from the hockey gods as to which side is likely to emerge over time as the ultimate winner of the trade, Callahan scored two goals for the Bolts.

St. Louis did score the Rangers’ only goal on Monday, so that’s good because if someone else had scored the Rangers’ only goal then this “huge mistake” that St. Louis made would have been that much bigger. But he scored and not another Ranger, so it’s only a “huge mistake” for now.

I wish I had known that the hockey gods would be giving us some foreshadowing at the Garden on Monday night because I could have accomplished a lot of other things between 7 and 10 p.m. instead of watching a poor defensive effort from a makeshift Rangers defense, highlighted by Dan Girardi taking a nice Sunday Skate in the neutral zone on what became a breakaway and then sliding and rolling around on the ice rather than clearing the front of the net on Ryan Callahan’s first goal. But that goal wasn’t Girardi’s fault or him proving that his six-year, $33 million extension wasn’t the best idea. That goal was the result of the hockey gods foreshadowing the eventual outcome of the St. Louis trade.

More importantly, the Lightning also got another banner night from Steven Stamkos, who scored once and added two assists while being the most dangerous player on the ice. Why St-Louis would want to leave a team with a young superstar for one that didn’t have anyone comparable is head-scratching, to say the least.

Does Proteau really think St. Louis cares about Steven Stamkos, playing with Stamkos, not playing with Stamkos or playing for a team without Stamkos?

St. Louis is from Quebec. He went to school at Vermont. His wife is from Greenwich, Conn. where the family lives in the offseason and St. Louis runs a summer hockey camp at the Twin Rinks in Stamford, Conn. Madison Square Garden is about 31.7 miles from Greenwich and 45 minutes on Metro North.

Not only did St. Louis likely want to live in one location to be with his entire family year-round, but I’m sure his wife also had some impact on his decision making because it is his wife and I’m going to assume that she has some say in the decisions St. Louis makes. Is Friday Night Lights not available in Canada? Eric and Tammy Taylor could teach you a few valuable life lessons.

But it’s more than just the presence of Stamkos that makes St-Louis’ decision to leave Tampa Bay a regrettable one.

Again, I’m sure 39-year-old St. Louis, who has a wife and kids and whose home is about 31.7 miles from the Garden, really took into account the idea of playing hockey with a 24-year-old when weighing his family’s own future.

The Rangers have had some serious injuries to deal with this season (including key cogs Derek Stepan and Ryan McDonagh), but even with those players in the lineup, the Lightning are deeper at forward and on defense and have more blossoming young talent (including Jonathan Drouin, Victor Hedman, Tyler Johnson and Nikita Kucherov, among others) than the Blueshirts.

Effing St. Louis! How could he have not known the Rangers would be dealing with injuries to Derek Stepan, Dan Boyle and Ryan McDonagh to start the season? How could he not have realized that the Rangers’ best two defensemen and their first-line center would miss significant time to begin the season?

And with goalie Ben Bishop proving his superb 2013-14 campaign was no fluke, you can’t even argue the Rangers have a significant advantage in net anymore – at least, not when star Henrik Lundqvist is struggling to find his consistency so far this year.

I originally thought Proteau using one game as a reason to decide who won the St. Louis was as bad it was going to get? But then he went and wrote that St. Louis should have put the notion of playing hockey with a 24-year-old over what’s best for his own family and I thought that was as bad as it would get, but then that goalie comparison happened.

After Monday’s loss, Henrik Lundqvist is 7-5-3 with a 2.68 goals-against average and .910 save percentage. No, those aren’t Lundqvist-like numbers, but when you have Matt Hunwick playing in all but two games so far and Michael Kostka, Dylan McIlrath and Connor Allen dressing and playing because of injuries and John Moore deciding to Scott Stevens people then you’re not going to have Vezina-like numbers. But if we’re going to sit here and say Ben Bishop is better than Henrik Lundqvist because of six weeks of a season then I guess Jakub Voracek is a better scorer than Sidney Crosby, Patric Hornqvist is a better pure goal scorer than Alexander Ovechkin and Nick Foligno is a 1.13 points-per-game player.

At the time of the trade, many speculated St-Louis’ relationship with Bolts GM Steve Yzerman over not initially being named to Canada’s 2014 Olympic roster had deteriorated to the point he demanded to be moved, and perhaps that’s true. As one of the greatest players in modern memory, he had accumulated enough power to ask out if he truly believed he didn’t fit with the organization any longer. However, the circumstances surrounding St-Louis’ departure have never been made fully clear. Until they are, all we can judge St-Louis on are the facts apparent to us.

The “circumstances surrounding St. Louis’ departure have never been made fully clear” but I’m going to write a 545-word column about why he shouldn’t have asked for a trade! The only thing we’re missing from Proteau is the use of “having said that” in this masterpiece.

And right now, the fact is St-Louis left a team that looks to be a force with which to reckon for many years to come for a team whose leading scorer, Rick Nash, will be 31 years old next summer and whose backbone between the pipes will be 33 in March.

The Lightning finished 46-27-9 last year and were swept in the first round by the Canadiens, who the Rangers eliminated two rounds later. This year they are 13-4-2 and are currently second in the Atlantic and there’s a good chance they will face the Bruins or Canadiens or both in the first round this year. Then I guess we’ll find out about the reckoning. (The Lightning also have to play 63 games before they get to that point before they can show off their “force”.)

At 39 years old, he wants to win now, but does anyone see the Rangers as a serious threat to win the Eastern Conference again this year? At this stage, there’s no guarantee they’ll even be in the post-season.

I think Proteau needs to get the idea that St. Louis “wants to win now” out of his head. I’m sure he would like to win and is doing everything he can to win, but if he retires without winning again, he will retire with his name on the Cup, over 1,000 career points (he’s at 995 now) and at least one Hart, one Lester B. Pearson, two Art Rosses, three Lady Byngs and six All-Star appearances.

There’s no guarantee the Rangers will be in the postseason this year. There’s also no guarantee the Lightning will either. Or the Canadiens. Or the Blackhawks. Or the Kings. Or the Blues. Or any team.

St-Louis has had a Hall-of-Fame worthy career, but even Hall-of-Famers make mistakes. And thus far, his choice to leave Stamkos & Co. behind looks to be the worst move he could’ve made.

Martin St. Louis helped lead the Rangers to the Stanley Cup Final in June and gave Rangers fans their best season in two decades. He lives in Greenwich, Conn. with his wife and kids. He is making $5 million this year to play hockey for a living and gets to do his job at Madison Square Garden. If demanding a trade to get all of these things is the worst decision he could have made then I need to start making bad decisions.

Read More

BlogsGiantsNFL

NFL Week 11 Picks

I usually make the picture for the weekly picks of either Eli Manning or Tom Coughlin, but I couldn’t help but choose Perry Fewell looking like most people walking through McCarran International Airport in Las

Perry Fewell

I usually make the picture for the weekly picks of either Eli Manning or Tom Coughlin, but I couldn’t help but choose Perry Fewell looking like most people walking through McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas on their way to their return flight home. Fewell’s look and demeanor sum up how his defense played last week in Seattle against the run, how the Giants’ season is going and how this picks season has been going for the most part.

I’m running out of time to right the ship that has been devastated by one bad week back in Week 2 and it’s going to take the opposite of that Week 2 performance to fully recover. I have been waiting eight weeks, or basically half the season, for that week to come and it hasn’t, but it needs to.

(Home team in caps)

MIAMI -4 over Buffalo
Last week, I picked the Bengals thinking they would continue to be the Saints 2.0 with their play at Paul Brown Stadium, but that didn’t go so well. (At least I was able to salvage my pick by taking the Browns money line at +250, which is all that really matters.) But this week it’s time get back on track with the old bread and butter that is Thursday Night Football.

CLEVELAND -3.5 over Houston
Well, it looks like the Johnny Manziel era isn’t going to start soon in Cleveland and maybe it never will at this rate. I wish the Jets had taken Manziel with the 18th pick in the draft because it would have meant the Johnny Manziel NFL era would already be underway and it would have meant absolute chaos and a media circus around the Jets, which is exactly what Woody Johnson wants and craves. But if I can’t beat the Browns by picking against them in hopes of Johnny Football becoming the starting quarterback, I might as well join them.

MINNESOTA +3.5 over Chicago
I will pick any team against the Bears right now. Any team. It doesn’t matter who.

KANSAS CITY -2 over Seattle
I have no idea what to do with this game and that should mean “take the points” but I have seen what happens when Russell Wilson has to throw the ball and the Chiefs’ defense isn’t going to roll over like the Giants did a week ago.

CAROLINA -1 over Atlanta
The Falcons are 3-6 and two of their three wins came against the Buccaneers. So if the Buccaneers didn’t exist, the Falcons would be a one-win team, so they should be treated as a one-win team. The disgusting part about the one-win Falcons is that they are still not only alive but they are one game, ONE GAME, back of the Saints for the NFC South lead. I SAID ONE GAME! The NFC South has become the 2010 NFC West and there’s a chance that the South could be won by a team with possibly a .500 record at best. But it would be pretty amazing if the 7-9 Saints (or the 8-8 Saints) host the wild-card Seahawks during Wild-Card Weekend at the Superdome where no team is going to go to and win a playoff game.

As for the Panthers, what’s a more undeserving nickname in sports: James Shields as “Big Game James” or Cam Newton as “Superman”?

NEW ORLEANS -7.5 over Cincinnati
So you know that thing I always say about the Saints? This thing:

The Saints’ last home loss with Sean Payton as head coach came in Week 17 in 2010 when they had nothing to play for. Including the playoffs, with Payton as head coach, the Saints have won all of their home games since that loss and here are their margins of victory in those games: 19, 6, 11, 25, 18, 3, 32, 18, 21, 24, 6, 17, 28, 29, 14, 25, 11, 55, 7 and 17.

Well, I can’t use that anymore. But I can use a new version of it!

The Saints’ have last one home game with Sean Payton as head coach since Week 17 in 2010 when they had nothing to play for. Including the playoffs, with Payton as head coach, the Saints have all but one of their home games since that loss and here are their margins of victory in those games: 19, 6, 11, 25, 18, 3, 32, 18, 21, 24, 6, 17, 28, 29, 14, 25, 11, 55, 7 and 17.

Andy Dalton going on the road after going 10-for-33 for 86 yards and three interceptions and not just on the road, but to the Superdome of all places? The local games and the Red Zone channel might not be enough for me this weekend, knowing that this game is on, I might have to buy DirecTV just for it.

Tampa Bay +7.5 over WASHINGTON
The Redskins are 3-6. Their wins are against the Jaguars, the Titans and the Tony Romo-less Cowboys. RG III has played two games this year and the Redskins have lost both. Which of those facts could give anyone the idea that they should be favored by more than a touchdown against any team?

Denver -10.5 over ST. LOUIS
I’m sure Peyton Manning misses playing in a dome in a controlled environment where the weather is always perfect and wind is non-existent. Peyton might not be at his best when he’s at Gillette Stadium or the stage is its biggest, but he is at his best when he’s in a perfect setting.

NEW YORK GIANTS +4.5 over San Francisco
Now that the season is over (well, unless the Giants run the table … and even that might not be enough with the way the NFC is this year), I don’t have any real reason to pick the Giants.

Oakland +10.5 over SAN DIEGO
At 5-1, the Chargers were considered to possibly be the best team in the NFL, at least for a week. But since Week 6 their season has unraveled with three straight losses to the Chiefs (23-20), Broncos (35-21) and Dolphins (37-0!!!) I always, always, always take the points when the Raiders play the Chargers except when I didn’t back in Week 6 and the Chargers barely got past the winless Raiders with a 31-28 win. This time I’m going back to the basics and that is picking against Philip Rivers to cover spreads.

GREEN BAY -6.5 over Philadelphia
Mark Sanchez did to me on Monday night what I dared him to do, which is the same thing I dared Colt McCoy to do a few Monday nights ago. To my defense, I made my pick in that Cowboys-Redskins game before Tony Romo was ruled out for the game and I made my pick for the Eagles-Panthers game under the assumption that the Panthers were an average football team capable of shutting down a quarterback the Jets chose Geno Smith over. Now the entire world has seemingly forgot how bad Sanchez was with the Jets and he is suddenly a fan favorite in Philadelphia, a city that preys on the exact type of player Sanchez was with the Jets. That Mark Sanchez will show up in Green Bay.

Detroit +1 over ARIZONA
When Drew Stanton filled in for Carson Palmer in Weeks 2-4, the Cardinals knew it was temporary and he knew it was temporary. There wasn’t any pressure on a backup quarterback, who hadn’t started a game in four years, to beat the Giants or 49ers (which he did) or try to be competitive against the Broncos (which he really wasn’t). But Stanton came out of that three-game stretch at 2-1 and two years after being cut by the Jets in favor of Tim Tebow, he proved that he could not only be a viable backup in the event of another Palmer injury, but that he could win in the league. The difference now is that there isn’t a light at the end of the tunnel for Stanton’s starting time. Palmer isn’t coming back this season and who knows what he will be like next year as a 35-year-old coming off a torn ACL. Stanton is now expected to win because he did in September and he’s expected to lead a 7-1 team to the playoffs and his head coach didn’t do him any favors by saying the Cardinals could win the Super Bowl with him as their quarterback. No pressure or anything, Drew.

New England +2.5 over INDIANAPOLIS
It would probably be a good idea to stop making the Patriots underdogs.

Last week: 6-7-0
Season: 69-77-1

Read More